Andrew Straw has emphasized that the current strategy of appending the SVN version number to development versions of the SVN tree makes it hard to do version sorting.
His proposal is to not change the version number until the first beta comes out. In other words, the trunk should not be 1.1 but 1.0dev? Are there any opposing opinions to this change. I personally think that is a confusing numbering scheme because 1.0dev seems to imply it's the development for version 1.0 instead of 1.1. But, if several others think it's a good idea to support easy-sorting of version numbers, then I will conceed. Perhaps we can have a version 'number' as 1.0plus? -Travis ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
