On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 04:03:13PM -0700, Andrew Straw wrote: > Sasha wrote: > > >On 7/24/06, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>BTW, Fernando, all this is so that we can still have the svn revision > >>number in __version__, but so that it doesn't screw up sorting. > > > >Sorting __version__ is screwed up regardless of svn revision number: > > > >>>>'1.9' < '1.10' > >>>> > >>>> > >False > > > Not if you parse __version__ with something that understands version > numbers.
...and we've already got something for that: distutils.version.LooseVersion (or StrictVersion). -- |>|\/|< /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ |David M. Cooke http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/ |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
