Greg Willden wrote: > On 10/4/06, *Travis Oliphant* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Great contribution. Thanks a bunch. I think this will probably go into > the scipy package, though. There is already a lot of windows available > in the scipy.signal.window function. > > BTW. Is there some sort of clear statement about what goes in Scipy > versus what goes in Numpy? It's a bit confusing for this newbie.
IMO, I'd rather see this and similar functions go into scipy. New functions that apply semantics to arrays (in this case, treating them as time series), I think should go into scipy. New functions that treat arrays simply as arrays and are generally useful can probably go into numpy. There's some grey area in this scheme, of course. New non-uniform random number generators might need to go into numpy, for now, simply due to technical reasons. Fleshing out the masked array and matrix classes would be similar, I imagine. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
