>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> IMO, I'd rather see this and similar functions go into
Robert> scipy. New functions that apply semantics to arrays (in
Robert> this case, treating them as time series), I think should
Robert> go into scipy. New functions that treat arrays simply as
Robert> arrays and are generally useful can probably go into
Robert> numpy.
I prefer Perry's longstanding suggestion: things that do not add to
distribution complexity should go into numpy. If it compiles as
easily as numpy itself, it should go into numpy where sensible. It
remains a fact of life that numpy gets a wider distribution than
scipy, and some packages are hesitant to require scipy as a prereq
because of the additional complexity or building fortran, etc. I
would be nice to have as much as possible in the most widely
distributed package IMO.
JDH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
