> Perhaps that is the best way to move forward along with the work on a > "pylab" super-package.
A few years ago it seemed that scipy was developing to BE the super-package. It was to have plotting and some numpy flavour and all sorts of goodies for scientists. The name still implies that. People are now talking about a super-package that includes scipy as one of three packages. Definitely it seems that pylab is a bad name since it's already used by matplotlib and the last thing we want is another confusing name convention that becomes hard to google. But why not scipy? It seems the right name for a super-package. Jon This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion