A. M. Archibald wrote:
> Is setting out to create a "MATLAB replacement" a good goal?

No.

> the goal should be to create a useful tool for scientists.

Yes.

> but I think MATLAB is clearly already that, so (at first) it can serve
> as a definite objective. Of course, anyone who wants to make scipy
> *better* than MATLAB should be warmly encouraged...

It already *is* better!

I say this as a former, committed MATLAB user. I personally think Python 
is a much better foundation language, and numpy a better array 
implementation.

MATLAB two advantages (and they are big ones!): integrated plotting and 
a large and broad library of ready-to-use functions for a wide variety 
of computing.

MPL has almost solved one, and SciPy is getting better an better -- so 
we're really on the right track!

-Chris

-- 
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
                                                
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT         (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to