Agreed. I closed the PR. - Joe
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Alan Isaac <alan.is...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some people consider that not to be Pythonic: > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038855.html > > Alan Isaac > > On 4/12/2018 1:36 PM, Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz wrote: > >> Would it break backwards compatibility to add the input as a return value >> to np.random.shuffle? I doubt anyone out there is relying on the None >> return value. >> >> The change is trivial, and allows shuffling a new array in one line >> instead of two: >> >> x = np.random.shuffle(np.array(some_junk)) >> >> I've implemented the change in PR#10893. >> >> > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
