On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 17:12, Eric Wieser <wieser.eric+nu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't think it should be relegated to the "officially discouraged" > ghetto of `.legacy_index` > > The way I read it, the new spelling lof that would be the explicit but not > discouraged `image.vindex[rr, cc]`. > If I'm understanding correctly what can be achieved now by `arr[rr, cc]` would have to be modified to use `arr.vindex[rr, cc]`, which is a very large change in behaviour. I suspect that there a lot of situations out there which use `arr[idxs]` where `idxs` can mean one of a range of things depending on the code path followed. If any of those change, or a mix of nomenclatures are required to access the different cases, then havoc will probably ensue.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
