On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:15 PM Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could initially try just adding some "bonus" jobs (that are useful / nice, > but we can't afford to add to current CI load) as a trial maybe, and if > the free version or a deal / offer on better services proves more > expedient than what we currently have then progressively migrate if / as > appropriate. > +1 to Azure Pipelines if someone wants to work on the config. Appveyor is slowish. Not a major bottleneck for NumPy (yet), but for SciPy it is - often takes 2-4 hours for a build to complete. Ralf > Would also be cool to have native ppc64 arch in CI, but I checked briefly > with IBM and no such integration exists with github as far as the contact > knew. > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 17:03, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> We might want to take a look at testing/building on AZURE >> <https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/devops/pipelines/?&OCID=AID736750_SEM_CmoL6wVZ>. >> Probably worth exploring, although it is hard to find all information. >> IIRC, we got an offer from Microsoft along these lines a couple of years >> ago when we were looking to support MSVC. >> >> Chuck >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
