On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:38 PM Pavlyk, Oleksandr <
oleksandr.pav...@intel.com> wrote:

> Sorry for not being more explicit.
>
>
>
> Yes, the milestone gives me a set of PRs whose changes are designated for
> 1.16
>
>
>
> If I were to manually build sources for 1.16 candidate I would
>
> 1.       create a branch at some SHA in the master,
>
> 2.       cherry-pick commits from PRs enumerated in milestone/58
> not reachable from the chosen SHA.
>
>
>
> What I am missing is the convention on how to choose the merge-base in
> step 1.
>
>
>
> I am interesting in building sources so that I can try to generate patches
> on top of these sources in advance, and have myself enough time to resolve
> possible conflicts.
>

Just master right now. At some point, there will be a release branch, but
that will be much closer to the release when most of the PRs are merged
already merged and it's just last minute fixes and release-specific changes
(e.g. bumping version numbers, etc.) to do.

-- 
Robert Kern
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to