This might be worth creating a github issue for simply so we can tag someone working at LGTM; they've been helpful in the past, and it's possible we just need to fiddle with some configuration to make it work.
It's also worth noting that LGTM runs against C code too; so even if we disable it for python, it might be worth keeping around for C. Eric On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 at 21:27, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > LGTM on github uses Python 3.7, which causes a problem if we drop 3.7 > support. LGTM is nice for pointing to possible code improvements, but we > mostly ignore it anyway. There are probably standalone code analysers that > would serve our needs as well, so dropping it seems the easiest way forward. > > Thoughts? > > Chuck > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
