On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 5:38 AM Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 10:33 +0300, matti picus wrote: > > On Sat, 21 May 2022 at 08:46, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 3:40 AM Charles R Harris < > > > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > I've put up new stable documentation for NumPy 1.22.4. I'd > > > > appreciate it > > > > if those familiar with how they want the documentation to look > > > > could take a > > > > look at it so that fixes can be made while I'm still in the > > > > documentation > > > > state. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Chuck. It all looks fine to me. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Ralf > > > > > > > I don’t see the version pull down, is that my browser? > > I was a bit surprised by that as well but I/we forgot to mark the PR as > backport candidate, so it slipped through: > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/21426 > > If backport+pushing docs again is very easy that could be nice? But > otherwise we will have it on the "stable" docs with 1.23 anyway. > > Pamphile still has a styling PR open: > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/21451 > > But maybe it doesn't matter (compared to just having the pulldown). > > I can do that without a new release (I use Python 3.10 and modify the procedure and doc/Makefile a bit), so mark them for backport if you want new docs. But it is probably easier to wait for 1.23. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
