On Sat, 21 May 2022 at 16:26, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 5:38 AM Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> > wrote: > >> On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 10:33 +0300, matti picus wrote: >> > On Sat, 21 May 2022 at 08:46, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 3:40 AM Charles R Harris < >> > > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi All, >> > > > >> > > > I've put up new stable documentation for NumPy 1.22.4. I'd >> > > > appreciate it >> > > > if those familiar with how they want the documentation to look >> > > > could take a >> > > > look at it so that fixes can be made while I'm still in the >> > > > documentation >> > > > state. >> > > > >> > > >> > > Thanks Chuck. It all looks fine to me. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Ralf >> > > >> > >> > I don’t see the version pull down, is that my browser? >> >> I was a bit surprised by that as well but I/we forgot to mark the PR as >> backport candidate, so it slipped through: >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/21426 >> >> If backport+pushing docs again is very easy that could be nice? But >> otherwise we will have it on the "stable" docs with 1.23 anyway. >> >> Pamphile still has a styling PR open: >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/21451 >> >> But maybe it doesn't matter (compared to just having the pulldown). >> >> > I can do that without a new release (I use Python 3.10 and modify the > procedure and doc/Makefile a bit), so mark them for backport if you want > new docs. But it is probably easier to wait for 1.23. > > Chuck > Then the 1.22 docs would not have the pull down. Not the end of the world, but if it is easy to add it would be nice. Matti > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
