On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:57 AM Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As mentioned earlier, I would like to propose changing the
> representation of scalars in NumPy. Discussion and ideas on changes
> are much appreciated!
>
> The main change is to show scalars as:
>
> * `np.float64(3.0)` instead of just `3.0`
> * `np.True_` instead of `True`
> * `np.void((3, 5), dtype=[('a', '<i8'), ('b', 'u1')])` instead of
> `(3, 5)`
> * Use `np.` rather than `numpy.` for datetime/timedelta.
>
These all seem like good ideas to me, thanks for working on this Sebastian.
Cheers,
Ralf
> This way it is clear for users that they are dealing with NumPy scalars
> which behave different from Python scalars.
> The `str()` that is given when using `print()` and the way arrays are
> shown will be unchanged.
>
> The NEP draft can be found here:
>
> https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0051-scalar-representation.html
>
> and it includes more details and related changes.
>
> The implementation is largely finished and can be found here:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/22449
>
> W are fairly late in the release cycle and the change should not block
> other things. So, the aim is to merge it early in the next release
> cycle. That way downstream has time to fix documentation is wanted.
>
> Depending on how discussion goes, I hope to formally propose the NEP
> fairly soon, so that the merging the implementation doesn't need to
> wait on NEP approval.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 11:38 +0200, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> >
> > TL;DR: NumPy scalars representation is e.g. `34.3` instead of
> > `float32(34.3)`. So the representation is missing the type
> > information. What are your thoughts on changing that?
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am thinking about the next steps for NEP 50 (The NEP wants to fix
> > the
> > NumPy promotion rules, especially with respect to scalars):
> >
> > https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0050-scalar-promotion.html
> >
> > In relation to that, there was one point that Stéfan brought up
> > previously.
> >
> > The NumPy scalars (representation) currently print as numbers:
> >
> > >>> np.float32(34.3)
> > 34.3
> > >>> np.uint8(5)
> > 5
> >
> > That can already be confusing now. However, it gets more problematic
> > if NEP 50 is introduced since the behavior between a Python `34.3`
> > and
> > `np.float32(34.3)` would differ more than it does now (please refer
> > to
> > the NEP).
> >
> > The change would be that we should print as:
> >
> > float64(34.3) (or similar?)
> >
> > This Email is mainly to ask for any feedback or concern on such a
> > change. I suspect we may have to write a very brief NEP about it.
> >
> > If there is little concern, maybe we could move forward such a change
> > promptly. Otherwise it could be moved forward together with NEP 50
> > and
> > take effect in a "major" release [1].
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] Note that for me, even a major release would hopefully not affect
> > the majority of users or be very disruptive.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
> > Member address: sebast...@sipsolutions.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
> Member address: ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
