Keith Goodman wrote: > On Nov 12, 2007 10:51 AM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Nov 13, 2007 3:37 AM, Keith Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Nov 12, 2007 10:10 AM, Peter Creasey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> The following code calling numpy v1.0.4 fails to terminate on my machine, >>>> which was not the case with v1.0.3.1 >>>> >>>> from numpy import arange, float64 >>>> from numpy.linalg import eig >>>> a = arange(13*13, dtype = float64) >>>> a.shape = (13,13) >>>> a = a%17 >>>> eig(a) >>>> >>> It sounds like the same problem that was reported in this thread: >>> >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/17456/focus=17465 >>> >>> A friend of mine says the windows binary of 1.0.4 also hangs on eigh >>> and lstsq (so linalg in general). I don't have that problem on 1.0.5 >>> compiled on GNU/Linux. >>> >> Could you friend try the binaries there: >> >> http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2007-November/029811.html >> >> This may be a problem related to the blas/lapack used for the >> binaries. The binaries posted above use non optimized BLAS/LAPACK (I >> can update to 1.0.4 if this is a problem). >> > > He tried. But he is using python 2.4. (He said your binary was for 2.5). > Here we are:
http://www.ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp/members/david/archives/numpy-1.0.4.win32-py2.4.exe David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
