On Montag 07 April 2008, Robert Kern wrote: > I would prefer not to do it at all. We've just gotten people moved > over from Numeric; I'd hate to break their trust again.
+1. IMO, numpy has arrived at a state where there's just enough namespace clutter to allow most use cases to get by without importing much sub-namespace junk, and I think that's a good place to be (and to stay). For now, I'd be very careful about adding more. > > It is really nice to think about having NumPy Core, NumPy Full, > > NumPyKits, SciPy Core, SciPy Full and SciPyKits. > > Really? It gives me the shivers, frankly. Couldn't agree more. Andreas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
