On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Gael Varoquaux < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:52:45PM -0500, Travis E. Oliphant wrote: > > This discussion is interesting, but it is really better suited for 1.1, > > isn't it? > > Yes. The original dicussion was about adding simple financial functions > for Numpy. > > I think the functions you wrote should land somewhere. We may disagree on > where, and you should choose based on feedback here and your personnal > feeling, but I hope they will indeed be published somewhere. > These functions are of immediate and pressing concern because US tax returns are due April 15 ;) Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
