Alan G Isaac wrote: > Perhaps I should note that I have come around to what > I take to be Tim H's view that matrix indexing should should > work just like ndarray indexing, except that when it > produces a 2d result then a matrix is returned. (This means > giving up the current behavior of ``x[0,:]``.) I also agree > with those who want ``rows`` and ``cols`` attributes for > iteration.
+1 on all of that. > A small difference: I would have these yield > matrices. (I.e., no need for a new "vector" type.) So the only thing we "give up" (which we don't have now anyway) is something that acts like column and can be indexed like a 1-d object. I still think that would be nice, but maybe we're coming close to a consensus about the rest of it. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
