> I am puzzled by this. What is the rationale for x[i,:] not being a 1-d > object? Does this not require many special-case bits of code as well? > What about a[i,...]? That is what I would use to make a hierarchical > bit of code, and I would be startled to find myself in an infinite > loop waiting for the dimension to become one. >
The rationale is so you can write x[i,:] * A * x[:,i] and have it work correctly without the RowVector / ColumnVector objects. Maybe it's just easier to create them and be done with it. But, nobody has yet, so I'm not sure. -Travis _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
