On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charles R Harris wrote: > > Shouldn't this raise an NotImplementedError exception? > > > > In [7]: type(remainder(complex192(1), complex192(1))) > > Out[7]: <type 'NotImplementedType'> > I'm not sure if it is relevant in this case but we do need to keep in > mind that Python uses the NotImplementedType as a signal to hand off the > calculation to the other object in a binary operation. > > If we change this here we may affect that behavior, unintentionally. > It doesn't change the behavior of any of the ufuncs with array/array arguments. I need to write up comprehensive tests for the combinations of array/scalars and scalars,scalars, but there don't seem to be problems there either. Can I also suggest that we not promote arrays of numeric types to arrays of objects? Is there some way of preventing this? Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
