On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles, Jarrod, > That isn't be a pb. I just ran into a pb with 1.2 that I know would show up > in > 1.1.x, so I just commited the changes to the 2 versions. I was just > wondering > for how long I would have to backport this kind of fixes. > > > I agree with the caveat that your focus should be mostly on 1.2 at > > this point. If your fix for 1.2 is not easy to back port to 1.1.x, I > > wouldn't worry about it too much. Ideally we will get all the fixes > > in 1.2 back to 1.1.x, but it isn't absolutely essential that every fix > > make it back. That said I would really like to see as many fixes as > > possible applied to both the trunk and the last stable release branch. > > >
I think one more 1.1.x release might be appropriate, if only to have one solid version out for Python 2.3. Hopefully Scipy will also release a compatible version. And then we should put an end date on the series, say Jan 1, 2009 or maybe after the first bugfix release of 1.2. Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
