On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 13:40, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Charles, Jarrod, >> That isn't be a pb. I just ran into a pb with 1.2 that I know would show >> up in >> 1.1.x, so I just commited the changes to the 2 versions. I was just >> wondering >> for how long I would have to backport this kind of fixes. >> >> > I agree with the caveat that your focus should be mostly on 1.2 at >> > this point. If your fix for 1.2 is not easy to back port to 1.1.x, I >> > wouldn't worry about it too much. Ideally we will get all the fixes >> > in 1.2 back to 1.1.x, but it isn't absolutely essential that every fix >> > make it back. That said I would really like to see as many fixes as >> > possible applied to both the trunk and the last stable release branch. > > I think one more 1.1.x release might be appropriate, if only to have one > solid version out for Python 2.3. Hopefully Scipy will also release a > compatible version.
Too late for that. SVN scipy already requires SVN numpy. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
