On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David, I second your approach. Furthermore, look how SWIG handles > this, it is very similar to your proposal. The difference is that SWIG > uses SWIGUNUSED for some autogenerated functions. Furthermore, it > seems the SWIG developers protected the generated code taking into > account GCC versions ;-) and the C++ case, and also Intel compilers.
Yes, I would have been surprised if most compilers do not have a way to deal with that. I did not know icc handled __attribute__. Charles, are you still have strongly against this, since this is in the vein of what you suggested (tagging the argument) ? cheers, David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
