On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:28 AM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David, I second your approach. Furthermore, look how SWIG handles > > this, it is very similar to your proposal. The difference is that SWIG > > uses SWIGUNUSED for some autogenerated functions. Furthermore, it > > seems the SWIG developers protected the generated code taking into > > account GCC versions ;-) and the C++ case, and also Intel compilers. > > Yes, I would have been surprised if most compilers do not have a way > to deal with that. I did not know icc handled __attribute__. > > Charles, are you still have strongly against this, since this is in > the vein of what you suggested (tagging the argument) ? > I think tagging the argument is the way to go. Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
