Andrew Dalke wrote: > Andrew Dalke: > >> Any chance of someone reviewing my suggestions for >> making the import somewhat faster still? >> >> http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/874 >> >> > > > Travis E. Oliphant: > >> In sum: I think 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 can be done immediately. 1) and >> 4) could be O.K. but 1) does break code and 4 I'm not sure >> about. 5 >> seems like it's too much code duplication for too little savings >> for my >> taste. >> > > Since no one else has said yea or nay, and 2.1 release draws nigh[*], > the simplest solution is to do 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9. I showed that > 1 will break existing code. As for #4 - as far as I can tell the code > in 'doc' is recent, so no user code depends on it. Plus, the > documentation that's there is effectively unusable, with files like: > >
I say go ahead including changing #1 and #4. Let's leave 5 for the moment. -Travis _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
