Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > 2008/8/18 Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I say go ahead including changing #1 and #4. Let's leave 5 for the moment. >> > > I ran several benchmarks and made sure that these imports take a > minimal amount of time. Wouldn't we want users to have access with > the doc framework without doing anything special? And, yes, some of > the documents are empty, but a number of them have already been > written. > > I still think we are going about this the wrong way. We have two > different sets of expectations, and we can't satisfy both by ripping > everything apart. I'd much prefer two entry points into NumPy: one > for people who need speed, and one for those who need the convenience > of everything being at hand. > > I think you are right Stefan. It would be great to have another name-space that is lighter from which numpy imports. But there is no reason to hold up these useful speed increases waiting for a better solution.
-Travis _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
