Francis wrote: > Thank you for your effort. I guess garnumpy reflects the idea in this > Pylab discussion: http://www.scipy.org/PyLab > > Again I get errors in libblas/lapack related to gfortran (local > variable problems). I replaced the libblas.a and the liblaplack.a by > the ones of sage. And started make install again. It seems to work > until it tries to configure/install umfpack. If you install blas/lapack from sage, it kind of defeats the whole purpose of garnumpy. The goal is to have a unified set of options to build. It is likely that sage uses different options than the ones from garnumpy. If you use garnumpy, you should use it for everything: it is an all for nothing, intended to replace broken distributions/workstations where you don't have admin rights.
When I updated a bit garnumpy yesterday, I tested it on CENTOS 5, which is the distribution you are using, right ? > > xerbla.f:(.text+0xd7): undefined reference to `_g95_stop_blank' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[4]: *** [umfpack_di_demo] Error 1 > Yes, that's expected: you are using blas from sage, this cannot work. > Perhaps it possible to skip the installation of the umfpack since I > probably won't need it or it requires the other libblas.a. > Just wildly guessing here. garnumpy by default does not install umfpack (scipy only requires blas/lapack, and by default, garnumpy only install what is needed; you can configure it to build umfpack, atlas, whatever, but by default, only the minimal stuff), so I am not sure why you have umfpack errors. cheers, David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
