Charles R Harris wrote: > > I'm pretty sure about the reference leak. But what should be the > standard for checking arguments and error returns in these object loops?
I was wondering the same when I worked on that code a few weeks ago; since the ufunc "return" void, I wonder how feasible it would be to return an int instead for error messaging. Since the ufunc are not used directly outside numpy, it should not break the API/ABI in any way ? I think more generally it would be nice to have a common error system for the pure C code, because it is a bit of a mess right now. But that would be again a lot of work :) David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
