On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 23:31, David Cournapeau > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Charles R Harris wrote: > >> > >> I'm pretty sure about the reference leak. But what should be the > >> standard for checking arguments and error returns in these object loops? > > > > I was wondering the same when I worked on that code a few weeks ago; > > since the ufunc "return" void, I wonder how feasible it would be to > > return an int instead for error messaging. Since the ufunc are not used > > directly outside numpy, it should not break the API/ABI in any way ? > > There are ufunc loop implementations outside of numpy. It would break > the API, specifically the typedef PyUFuncGenericFunction. > Good point! Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
