David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Peter Norton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:28 PM, David Cournapeau
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Charles R Harris wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What happens if you go the usual python setup.py {build,install} route?
>>> Won't go far since it does not handle sunperf.
>>>
>>> David
>>
>> Even though the regular build process appears to complete, it seems to be
>> doing the wrong thing. It seems, for instance, that lapack_lite.so is being
>> built as an executable:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11:14 ~ $ gnu file
>> /usr/local/python-2.5.1/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/linalg/lapack_lite.so
>> /usr/local/python-2.5.1/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/linalg/lapack_lite.so:
>> ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked
>> (uses shared libs), not stripped
>> ???

Hi,

> I think this is "expected" if python was built with one compiler and
> numpy with another (python with Forte and numpy with gcc). Distutils
> knows the options from python itself, wether it is optional in
> numscons (in theory, you can set it up to use python options or known
> configurations).

Hmm, I have recently build numpy 1.2.1 on FreeBSD 7 and had trouble with 
lapacK_lite.so. The fix was to add a "-shared" flag. I needed the same 
fix for Cygwin.

> I don't think you will have much hope with distutils, unless you are
> ready to add code by yourself (sunperf will be very difficult to
> support, though). 

Why? What do you think makes sunperf problematic? [Not that I want to do 
the work, just curious :)]

> The numscons error has nothing to do with solaris,
> the scons scripts should be there. Could you give me the full output
> of python setupscons.py scons ?
> 
> David

Cheers,

Michael

> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
> http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> 

_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to