Pierre GM wrote: > Ryan, > OK, I'll look into that. I won't have time to address it before this > next week, however. Option #2 looks like the best.
No hurries, I just want to make sure I raise any issues I see while the design is still up for change. > In other news, I was considering renaming genloadtxt to genfromtxt, > and using ndfromtxt, mafromtxt, recfromtxt, recfromcsv for the > function names. That way, loadtxt is untouched. +1 I know I've changed my tune here, but at this point it seems like there's so much more functionality here that calling it loadtxt would be a disservice to how much the new function can do (and how much work you've done). Ryan -- Ryan May Graduate Research Assistant School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
