Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:15:43 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Ondrej Certik <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just to make it clear -- I think the docs should not be generated in >> the tarball -- only the sources should be there. > > I agree this makes more sense for you, as a packager, but I am not sure > it makes much sense to put the doc sources in the tarball for users > (Building numpy should only require python + a C compiler; building the > doc is more difficult -you need at least sphinx and all its > dependencies). > > For audiolab, I put the generated doc, thinking if people want to mess > with the doc, they are knowledgeable enough to deal with svn - but I did > not think about the packagers :) I am not sure what's the best solution: > maybe put both in the (released) source tarball ?
I'd say that we put the source for the documentation to the documentation tarball, and distribute the built HTML+whatever documentation in a separate package. -- Pauli Virtanen _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
