Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:05:57 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Pauli Virtanen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:15:43 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Ondrej Certik <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Just to make it clear -- I think the docs should not be generated in >>>> the tarball -- only the sources should be there. >>> >>> I agree this makes more sense for you, as a packager, but I am not >>> sure it makes much sense to put the doc sources in the tarball for >>> users (Building numpy should only require python + a C compiler; >>> building the doc is more difficult -you need at least sphinx and all >>> its dependencies). >>> >>> For audiolab, I put the generated doc, thinking if people want to mess >>> with the doc, they are knowledgeable enough to deal with svn - but I >>> did not think about the packagers :) I am not sure what's the best >>> solution: maybe put both in the (released) source tarball ? >> >> I'd say that we put the source for the documentation to the >> documentation tarball, and distribute the built HTML+whatever >> documentation in a separate package. > > Why not to just include the *sources* together with numpy, and possibly > include html+whatever in a separate documentation package?
That's what I tried to say, but mistyped "source" as "documentation". -- Pauli Virtanen _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
