On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Robert Kern<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 22:54, David Goldsmith<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So would we regard a hard-copy of the users guide or reference manual for >> such a spreadsheet as sufficiently "permanent" to pass muster for use as a >> reference? > > The OpenFormula standard is probably better: > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/documents.php?wg_abbrev=office-formula >
This is a nice reference. There are notes for which packages agree/disagree, proprietary and open source, and values for tests. Skipper _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
