Thanks, both for your kind words and for the patch; I don't suppose I could prevail upon you to be Team Lead for doc-ing numpy.finacial?
DG --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Skipper Seabold <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, I concede defeat: if it is the wisdom of the PTB > that numpy.financial be retained, I will stop messing w/ > their help doc, 'cause I'm clearly in over my head. > > I wouldn't concede defeat just yet. A few weeks ago I > didn't even > know numpy.financial existed, and I appreciate your calling > attention > to the possibility that there could be problems. > > With this in mind. It looks like just trying to > follow these formulas > has led to some problems. There are different > "formulas" for the > modified internal rate of return out there, but they're all > trying to > say the same thing just not always very clearly, and this > led to > np.mirr being incorrect (though it looks like what the > formula in the > OpenFormula doc, for instance, says just not what it means > and does). > > I have filed a ticket here > <http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1138> with a > patch and tests. > Please let me know if I haven't done the patching and tests > correctly. > > Skipper > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
