On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Travis Oliphant <oliph...@enthought.com> wrote: > > The problem I have with spending time on it though is that there is still > more implementation work to finish on the datetime functionality to complete > the NEP implementation. Naturally, I'd like to see those improvements > made first. But, time-spent is usually a function of how much time it takes > to "get-in" to the code, so I won't try to distract you if you have a clear > idea about how to proceed.
Would it be possible to include next changes in small self-contained commits ? It really makes the review easier to follow for me, and tracking regressions is easier as well. Git-svn makes this easy. David _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
