On Oct 8, 2009, at 10:01 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Travis Oliphant <oliph...@enthought.com > > wrote: >> >> The problem I have with spending time on it though is that there is >> still >> more implementation work to finish on the datetime functionality to >> complete >> the NEP implementation. Naturally, I'd like to see those >> improvements >> made first. But, time-spent is usually a function of how much time >> it takes >> to "get-in" to the code, so I won't try to distract you if you have >> a clear >> idea about how to proceed. > > Would it be possible to include next changes in small self-contained > commits ? It really makes the review easier to follow for me, and > tracking regressions is easier as well. Git-svn makes this easy. >
That was the reason for merging to the trunk rather than continuing to work in the branch. I expect that the next changes will be more incremental. -Travis _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
