Hi, On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jarrod Millman <mill...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Should the release containing the datetime/hasobject changes be called >> >> a) 1.5.0 >> b) 2.0.0 > > My vote goes to b.
I guess Travis' point is that 2.0 implies rather large feature difference from - say 1.0.0 - and this isn't the case. On the other hand, I don't see what substantial difference that makes in the long run - we can always go to 3.0 for a big rewrite and I don't think we'll use any users as a result. On the other hand we might lose users from an ABI change not easily predicted from the version numbering. I guess what I'm saying is we have lots of integers left, and they are cheap, and I'd also vote for using one up to get round this little hurdle. Best, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
