Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > (I'd think one basically has to make the same blatant assumptions that > f2py makes about type conversion, name mangling etc., but that is also > much less dangerous/error-prone for Fortran 77.)
Everything related to name mangling can be handled by distutils/numscons, so this is not an issue (I am ready to help if necessary on that side). I don't really know the assumptions made by f2py otherwise: is it prevalent for most fortran compilers to pass most things by reference ? g77 uses the f2c convention I believe, but I don't know much about other compilers, especially proprietary ones, cheers, David _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion