On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase <seb.ha...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I >> supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised >> that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that >> technically not possible ? >> >> You're not being dense, there are no 2.5 scipy binaries. I did not succeed > in building them. The scipy 0.7 branch is so old (from Jan 2009) that it has > never been compiled on OS X 10.6, and I did not yet find a way to get it to > work. For Windows I also had problems, there it should be compiled against > numpy 1.2 while the 2.6 binaries are compiled against numpy 1.3. The > variations in numpy, python and OS just added up to make it unworkable. > > I can give it another try after the final release, but first priority is to > finally release. > To remind myself of the issue I tried building it again, and managed to build a 2.5 binary against numpy 1.3 on OS X at least. Can anyone tell me why 2.5 binaries are supposed to be built against numpy 1.2 and 2.6 binaries against numpy 1.3? Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
