On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase <seb.ha...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I >>> supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised >>> that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that >>> technically not possible ? >>> >>> You're not being dense, there are no 2.5 scipy binaries. I did not >> succeed in building them. The scipy 0.7 branch is so old (from Jan 2009) >> that it has never been compiled on OS X 10.6, and I did not yet find a way >> to get it to work. For Windows I also had problems, there it should be >> compiled against numpy 1.2 while the 2.6 binaries are compiled against numpy >> 1.3. The variations in numpy, python and OS just added up to make it >> unworkable. >> >> I can give it another try after the final release, but first priority is >> to finally release. >> > > To remind myself of the issue I tried building it again, and managed to > build a 2.5 binary against numpy 1.3 on OS X at least. Can anyone tell me > why 2.5 binaries are supposed to be built against numpy 1.2 and 2.6 binaries > against numpy 1.3? > > > It seems I've crawled a bit further up the learning curve since last time I tried. Scipy binaries for python 2.5 (built against numpy 1.2) are now on Sourceforge, please test them. Cheers, Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
