On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:08, Christopher Barker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/6/11 5:54 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: >> I suppose this might cause a problem with lazy/quick c extensions that >> expected elements in a certain order, so some breakage could occur. > > absolutely! > > (I've gotten a bit confused about this thread, but if this is about the > question of whether structured dtypes are dtypes are assumed to always > keep order, read on -- otherwise, ignore)..
Can someone explain exactly what changed? Or point to the changeset that made it? It's not clear to me what operations are different under Mark's changes. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
