On 02/18/2012 08:52 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 18, 2012, Sturla Molden wrote: > > > > Den 18. feb. 2012 kl. 17:12 skrev Alan G Isaac <[email protected] > <javascript:;>>: > > > > > > > How does "stream-lined" code written for maintainability > > (i.e., with helpful comments and tests) become *less* > > accessible to amateurs?? > > > I think you missed the irony. > > Sturla > > > Took me couple reads. Must be too early in the morning for me. > > For those who needs a clue, the last few lines seem to suggest that the > only way forward is to relicense numpy so that it could be sold. This > is obviously ridiculous and a give-away to the fact that everything else > in the email was sarcastic.
No, it was a quotation from Travis' blog: http://technicaldiscovery.blogspot.com/ (I think people should just get a grip on themselves...worst case scenario *ever* (and I highly doubt it) is a fork, and even that may well be better than the status quo) Dag _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
