This makes me ask something that I always wanted to know: why is weave not the preferred or encouraged way ?
Is it because no developer has interest in maintaining it or is it too onerous to maintain ? I do not know enough of its internals to guess an answer. I think it would be fair to say that weave has languished a bit over the years. What I like about weave is that even when I drop into the C++ mode I can pretty much use the same numpy'ish syntax and with no overhead of calling back into the numpy c functions. From the sourceforge forum it seems the new Blitz++ is quite competitive with intel fortran in SIMD vectorization as well, which does sound attractive. Would be delighted if development on weave catches up again. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
