On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:34:13AM -0700, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 04/03/2012 04:45 PM, srean wrote: > > This makes me ask something that I always wanted to know: why is weave > > not the preferred or encouraged way ?
> > Is it because no developer has interest in maintaining it or is it too > > onerous to maintain ? I do not know enough of its internals to guess > > an answer. I think it would be fair to say that weave has languished a > > bit over the years. > I think the story is that Cython overlaps enough with Weave that Weave > doesn't get any new users or developers. One big issue that I had with weave is that it compile on the fly. As a result, it makes for very non-distributable software (requires a compiler and the development headers installed), and leads to problems in the long run. Gael _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
