* Chris Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> [2012-04-09]: > 2012/4/9 Hänel Nikolaus Valentin <valentin.hae...@epfl.ch>: > > http://www.eos.ubc.ca/research/clouds/software/pythonlibs/num_util/num_util_release2/Readme.html > >> > >> that looks like it hasn't been updated since 2006 -- I"d say that > >> makes it a non-starter > > > > Yeah, thats what I thought... Until I found it in several production > > codes... > > are they maintaining it?
Well, no... thats «legacy code» that was handed down to me, more or less. > >> 4? > > > > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/libs/python/doc/v2/numeric.html > > (old) > > > > https://github.com/ndarray/Boost.NumPy > > (new) > > > > http://code.google.com/p/numpy-boost/ > (also pretty old -- I see this:) > > - Numpy (numpy.scipy.org) (Tested versions: 1.1.1, though >= 1.0 should work) > - Python (www.python.org) (Tested versions: 2.5.2, though >= 2.3 should work) > > both pretty old versions. > > http://www.eos.ubc.ca/research/clouds/software/pythonlibs/num_util/num_util_release2/Readme.html > > > also pretty old. > > So I'd go with the actively maintained on -- or Cython -- what I can > tell you is that Cython is being very widely used in the > numerical/scientific computing community -- but I haven't seen a lot > of Boost users. Maybe they use different mailing lists, and dont go to > SciPy or Pycon... Yeah, I would choose cython... if I had a choice... I have had boost.python mentioned a single time throughout the last four editions of EuroScipy2012 > I'm not sure you made your use case clear -- are you writing C++ > specifically for calling form Python? or are you working on a C++ lib > that will be used in C++ apps as well as Python apps? Currently just curious about the different tools available to fascilitate interoperability between numpy and boost.python. V- _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion