Hi, On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > 01.05.2012 11:14, David Froger kirjoitti: >> Excerpts from Travis Oliphant's message of mar. mai 01 01:39:26 +0200 2012: >> > If you have particular reasons why we should choose a particular CI >> > service, >> > please speak up and let your voice be heard. There is still time to > make >> > a difference in what we are setting up. >> >> Hi all, >> >> What about buildbot? (http://trac.buildbot.net/) >> >> I'm using it currently, and like it because is GPL 2, configuration files >> are >> powerful Python scripts, and development team is active and dynamic. > > We're currently using it: http://buildbot.scipy.org > Although, it hasn't been building automatically for some time now. > > It has the following shortcomings: > > - Apparently, for one master instance, only one project.
We're building 4 github projects with one buildbot process, and one master.cfg script, but maybe that's not what you meant? http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/builders > - Last time I looked, Git integration was poor. Maybe this has > improved since... Our projects use git pollers polling github repos. We did run into random occasional builds stalling at the git update step, but I believe that has been fixed with the latest release. Best, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion