On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Travis Oliphant <tra...@continuum.io>wrote:
> > Exactly. > > >> I don't >> feel responsible for this issue (except I maybe should have pushed >> more strongly about datetime being included), > > > I think you left out a 'not'. I don't mean to imply that you were in > anyway the blame. And you have been pretty adamant about not allowing late > merges of large bits of code since then. It falls in the lessons learned > category. > > but I am also not >> interested in making a big deal out of it, certainly not two years >> after the fact. I am merely point this out so that you realize that >> you may both have a different view that could be seen as valid >> depending on what you are willing to highlight. >> >> I suggest that Chuck and you take this off-list, >> > > I don't think there is much more to say, although I would suggest Travis > be more careful about criticising previous work, ala 'gratuitous', 'not > listening', etc. We got 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 out without any help from > him, and I think we did a pretty damn good job of working with the > community and improving the code in the process. > > > Wow! Again, your attitude surprises me and I can't just let a public > comment like that go unaddressed. Not *any* help from me. Is that really > the way you view it. Amazing! No wonder people new to the project lose > sight of where it came from if that's the kind of dialogue and spin you > spread. > > So, you are going to disregard anything I've done during that time. The > personal time spent on bug fixes and code enhancements, the active > discussions with people, the work on datetime, the contribution of > resources, the growing of the community, the teaching, the talking, the > actively trying to figure out just how to improve not only the state of the > code but also how it gets written, the documentation improvements (from my > early donation of my book). Just because you are not aware personally of > something or I don't comment on this list, it doesn't mean I'm not active. > I was not as active as I wanted to be sometimes (I do have other > responsibilities), but this kind of statement is pretty hurtful as well as > being completely inaccurate. > > "The community" is not just people that post to this list and a few users > of SciPy that you know about. "The community" is much larger than that, > and I've been working with them too --- all along, even when I wasn't > actively making releases. I would suggest that you be more careful > about accusing who is and who isn't "helping" with things. > I haven't been spinning. OTOH charris@f16 [numpy.git (master)]$ git log v1.2.1..v1.3.0 | grep -i oliphant | wc -l 23 charris@f16 [numpy.git (master)]$ git log v1.2.1..v1.3.0 | grep -i harris | wc -l 151 charris@f16 [numpy.git (master)]$ git log v1.2.1..v1.3.0 | grep -i cournapeau | wc -l 554 Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion