Le mercredi 15 août 2012 à 20:54 +0200, Ralf Gommers a écrit : > I was mixing it up a bit, but yes: the _odepack extension and the C > source for it. Not necessary to do that at once I guess, but wrapping > the same function twice is once too many. > > And forgot in my first email: nice PR, looks good to me.
OK then, you can found two commits : the first one removes the _odepack extension (and the relative multipack.h, __odepack.h and _odepackmodule.c), replacing it by Python counterparts in the odeint function itself. https://github.com/FabricioS/scipy/commit/02e8a4856f29f4ad438fef2c86a41b266d6a9e6c the second one suggests reverting callback arguments convention: ydot = f(y,t,..) to ode's one: ydot = f(t,y,..) This ones would raise backward compatibility issues but align ordering to the convention defined in the LLNL when designing the ODEPACK. https://github.com/FabricioS/scipy/commit/f867f2b8133d3f6ea47d449bd760a77a7c90394e -- Fabrice Silva _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
