On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Bradley M. Froehle <[email protected] > wrote:
> Targeting >= 2.6 would be preferable to me. Several other packages > including IPython, support only Python >= 2.6, >= 3.2. > > This change would help me from accidentally writing Python syntax which is > allowable in 2.6 & 2.7 (but not in 2.4 or 2.5). > > Compiling a newer Python interpreter isn't very hard… probably about as > difficult as installing NumPy. > > -Brad > > > On Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Skipper Seabold wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, David Cournapeau > > <[email protected](mailto: > [email protected])> wrote: > > <snip> > > > I would even go as far as dropping 2.5 as well then (RHEL 6 > > > uses python 2.6). > > > > +1 > > OK. Dropping support for python 2.4 looks like the majority opinion. I'll put up another post for 2.5. Do we need to coordinate with scipy? Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
